{"id":10213,"date":"2016-09-27T23:30:29","date_gmt":"2016-09-27T23:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/how-curiosity-can-protect-the-mind-from-bias\/"},"modified":"2016-09-27T23:30:29","modified_gmt":"2016-09-27T23:30:29","slug":"how-curiosity-can-protect-the-mind-from-bias","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/how-curiosity-can-protect-the-mind-from-bias\/","title":{"rendered":"How curiosity can protect the mind from bias"},"content":{"rendered":"

How curiosity can protect the mind from bias<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

stoweboyd<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

algeroth<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Kahan and his team were interested in politically biased information processing, but also in studying the audience for scientific documentaries and using this research to help film-makers. They developed two scales. The first measured a person\u2019s scientific background, a fairly standard set of questions asking about knowledge of basic scientific facts and methods, as well as quantitative judgement and reasoning<\/a>. The second scale was more innovative. The idea of this scale was to measure something related but independent \u2013 a person\u2019s curiosity about scientific issues, not how much they already knew. This second scale was also innovative in how they measured scientific curiosity. As well as asking some questions, they also gave people choices about what material to read as part of a survey about reactions to news. If an individual chooses to read about science stories rather than sports or politics, their corresponding science curiosity score was marked up.<\/p>\n

Armed with their scales, the team then set out to see how they predicted people\u2019s opinions on public issues which should be informed by science. With the scientific knowledge scale the results were depressingly predictable. The left-wing participants \u2013 liberal Democrats \u2013 tended to judge issues such as global warming or fracking as significant risks to human health, safety or prosperity. The right-wing participants \u2013 conservative Republicans \u2013 were less likely to judge the issues as significant risks. What\u2019s more, the liberals with more scientific background were most concerned about the risks, while the conservatives with more scientific background were least concerned. That\u2019s right \u2013 higher levels of scientific education results in a greater polarisation between the groups, not less.<\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

So much for scientific background, but scientific curiosity showed a different pattern. Differences between liberals and conservatives still remained \u2013 on average there was still a noticeable gap in their estimates of the risks \u2013 but their opinions were at least heading in the same direction. For fracking for example, more scientific curiosity was associated with more concern, for both liberals and conservatives.<\/p>\n

The team confirmed this using an experiment which gave participants a choice of science stories, either in line with their existing beliefs, or surprising to them. Those participants who were high in scientific curiosity defied the predictions and selected stories which contradicted their existing beliefs \u2013 this held true whether they were liberal or conservative.<\/p>\n

And, in case you are wondering, the results hold for issues in which political liberalism is associated with the anti-science beliefs, such as attitudes to GMO or vaccinations.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

All we have to do is create a virus that makes people more curious. A good scifi story there, I think.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

How curiosity can protect the mind from bias stoweboyd: algeroth: Kahan and his team were interested in politically biased information processing, but also in studying the audience for scientific documentaries and using this research to help film-makers. They developed two scales. The first measured a person\u2019s scientific background, a fairly standard set of questions asking […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"link","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-link","hentry","category-words","post_format-post-format-link"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p6PWot-2EJ","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rafaelfajardo.com\/portfolio\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}