code drawing 69


2015-06-28-10.23.57.1024 2015-06-28-10.24.06.1024 2015-06-28-10.24.19.1024 2015-06-28-10.24.29.1024 2015-06-28-10.24.47.1024 2015-06-28-10.26.14.1024 2015-06-28-10.26.20.1024 2015-06-28-10.26.26.1024 2015-06-28-10.26.37.1024 2015-06-28-10.26.51.1024 2015-06-28-10.26.59.1024 2015-06-28-10.27.05.1024 2015-06-28-10.27.17.1024 2015-06-28-10.27.32.1024 2015-06-28-10.27.59.1024 2015-06-28-10.28.06.1024 2015-06-28-10.28.11.1024 2015-06-28-10.29.16.1024 2015-06-28-10.29.35.1024 2015-06-28-10.30.12.1024 2015-06-28-10.55.34.1024 2015-06-28-10.55.39.1024 2015-06-28-10.55.44.1024 2015-06-28-10.55.50.1024 2015-06-28-10.55.58.1024 2015-06-28-10.56.09.1024 2015-06-28-10.56.17.1024 2015-06-28-10.56.31.1024 2015-06-28-10.56.47.1024 2015-06-28-10.57.37.1024 2015-06-28-10.58.06.1024 2015-06-28-10.58.23.1024 2015-06-28-10.58.40.1024 2015-06-28-10.59.05.1024

code drawing 69, various iterations, various states. these images were created on or about 2015-06-28. this drawing may have had some tweaks made to the code in between iterations. there are at least three iterations in this collection, and I hadn’t started to refine an incremental naming convention. there were no 69a, 69b, 69c, designated formally. now I wish there had been. it would be less confusing. I’m left with the document names from dropbox as a way to ensure that the sequence of images is faithful to the moment of their creation. in this way I can see that there are more than one iteration by the change in density of the marks. less density means I started the code drawing over. I don’t know what changes, if any, there were to the code in between iterations. looking at them now in the time-stamped sequence I believe that the variability of the line widths was tweaked.